Outside the field of fiction innovation is pretty much accepted as normal and indeed as desired, necessary and actually essential. No-one balks at the idea that you can come up with new technology or improvements that did not exist previously; no patents would be issued were this not the case. In science and many other academic fields, original research and discoveries are essential to advancing to Doctorate level and above, and quite obviously new science is being done all the time.
But when it comes to fiction it is not uncommon to find many voices and quite a few of those in positions of authority in the field claiming there are no original ideas, it has all been done before and all you can possibly hope to do is recycle old news with a half decent recent spin. Indeed it sometimes feels as though originality or striving for it is actually... a sin.
In fairness what these voices are advocating I suspect is that it is more useful for a writer to focus on telling a story in their own way, rather than trying to be make it completely different from what had come before. The thing was, I somehow cannot help feeling that it is possible to transgress in this way, and, even if difficult or something that happens rather than something you can engineer or be confident of, isn't it a sin you would aspire to, even hope for?
But there is some further that bothers me about the idea of originality in fiction being impossible; I think it is actually can be refuted by an exercise in simple logic. In reality new technologies appear all the time and have an impact on our cultural practises.
Take the example of blogging. I don’t know if anyone predicted this cultural practise or emergent properties such as individuals loosing their jobs as a result of an ill advised blog post, but surely they could have. If reality can innovate what could have been potential ideas for fiction, then surely human beings can innovate potential realities. Every story is a kind of description of a potential reality after all. And writers, fantasy and science fiction writers in particular, have the advantage over reality of being able to dream up things that cannot happen in the material world or are pretty unlikely to.
The more that I have pondered this matter across many years the more I have felt that even if it is hard to be a sinner, it is better to have your imagination blackened by such impure thoughts, because even if you can get close to it, the fiction and its concepts might be better for it. You might not be able to find it, but use your imagination and don’t accept limits on what you might do with it and it might find you.
I have a pretty good imagination, but do not claim to be a sinner, it is a lofty assumption to make about yourself. Nevertheless, I plan on doing my best to commit originality sin every which way at every possible opportunity and I hope there are many others out there as thoroughly corrupted as I.
The more that I have pondered this matter across many years the more I have felt that even if it is hard to be a sinner, it is better to have your imagination blackened by such impure thoughts, because even if you can get close to it, the fiction and its concepts might be better for it. You might not be able to find it, but use your imagination and don’t accept limits on what you might do with it and it might find you.
I have a pretty good imagination, but do not claim to be a sinner, it is a lofty assumption to make about yourself. Nevertheless, I plan on doing my best to commit originality sin every which way at every possible opportunity and I hope there are many others out there as thoroughly corrupted as I.